About Me

Name: Bill Crawford
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

Obama's Bluff

The President has been holding back his Afghanistan troop strategy decision, ostensibly to avoid affecting the runoff election there.
 
Well, it's been 48 hours now since the opposition withdrew and handed the government to Karzai, and still...silence.
 
So, I guess it becomes more obvious that the elections he doesn't want to affect are the ones here involving the turnout of the Democrat base.
 
Which means that his priorities are politics first, military issues second.
 
No surprise here.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Election Day Prelude

Before I kick off with the twenty hour day I have in front of me Tuesday, I must  warble one more time about what is coming nationally.
 
Earth to Obama Nation: I've been waring all of you about this for months now. The reaction has been bubbling up for a while now, and the only time the national press has noticed is when it spilled into Town Hall meetings. You see, this is a conservative reaction, and thus is brought by people who the national press corps don't speak to or hang out with.
 
Much is being made of the declining party identification, especially among Republicans. What has been largely ignored is the concurrent surge in conservative identification, without a corresponding movement in 'liberal'.
 
This is borne out in the 23rd CD in Watertown, NY. The third party put forth a conservative candidate, and the support and money for the GOP nominee died. She backed out because she was going nowhere fast. Her ploy that she was doing it for the party was shown to be farce when she turned and endorsed the Democrat the same day.
 
The Democrats have put all their eggs in Governor Corzine's basket- the only race they think they have a chance in. If Christie wins, Michelle Obama will be wearing funereal black Tuesday night, and it will no longer be a country that she can be proud of.
 
One way or another, 2010 can be a banner year for Republicans- IF they learn the lesson that the groundswell happening around them is a conservative one. If they can tap into that and tie in with the swing voter buyer's remorse in Obama, it will be an amazing year.
 
If the health care monstrosity passes, all those semi-conservative Democrats they ran to win the swing districts in 2006 and 2008 will be on the endangered species list. The crazy thing is, there is nothing the Dem leadership can do about it. Their only hope is that the Republicans will screw up the opportunity be being convinced that running "moderates" will get them back in power.
 
There are no guarantees in this life.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Importance Of Off Year Elections

This year is the beginning of what pollsters call a "reaction cycle". It's what happens when a strong wind blows through the electoral playground, and the American voters, who as a group are not strongly attached to either end of the spectrum, show a little buyer's remorse and do a little janitorial work.
 
I first encountered this after Nixon swept everything in sight in 1972. The following year, the Watergate stories that were in the Washington Post wilderness during the presidental election were getting mainstream traction, and there were a few key elections that the Democrats did very well with. In 1974, Nixon resigned, and the Democrats elected their Watergate Congress.
 
In 1993, after Clinton brought back the Democrats running everything for the first time since before Reagan, the Republicans won some prominent elections- notably Giuliani as NYC Mayor at Christine Whitman as NJ Governor. Those races became a harbinger of the Contract With America and the Gingrich Congress. That one was made possible by a horrendous, ham handed exploration into universal health care by the White House.
 
Segue to 2009. A year after the Obama windstorm swept through here, both parties are concentrating on three off year elections: the Governorships of New Jersey and Virginia, and the 23rd CD in upstate New York, vacated by an Obama appointment. Virginia is a dead issue already, as evidenced by the White House's Clintonian recriminations ('You would win this if you just listened to me'). Corzine is in a dead heat with Christie in Jersey.
 
The NY Congressional race was highlighted by an internecine Republican squabble between the GOP nominee and the conservative who was entering because he thought her views on many things made her party affiliation a joke. Well, Dede Scozzafava has dropped out, and the Democrats have all but given up hope on picking off a Republican seat by splitting the opposition.
 
That's starting off with a two handicap, folks.
 
And now, Obama Care is coming off the press, filled with all the goodies the frustrated Dem base demanded, but pushed just under the surface to (hopefully) allow just enough deniability to collar the last few dozen votes that Pelosi and Reid need, but do not yet have.
 
The only chance the Dems have to hold Congress in 2010 will be for this to fail on the House floor. If it passes, and it is what I think it is after perusing the first 200 pages, all hell will break loose next year.
 
That's a hell of a Faustian bargain. I don't envy Obama, and the "hope and change" expectations he brought with his own mouth.
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Goebbels Still Lives

A couple more "WTF" moments, where one simply stares at the television with an open mouth.
 
The new zombie creation (now that HR 3200 died it's Town Hall death) is a 2000 page monstrosity. They managed to get the CBO scoring below the $900 billion goal by remanding most of the Medicare revisions into another omnibus. Doing their best to overlook these games, Reid, Pelosi and Obama all swear that none of this will add a dime to the deficit, now or ever.
 
WTF?
 
After news reports (including CBS, for gosh sakes) spend a few cycles reviewing how the Administration job creation reports stemming from the Stimulus package (A.R.R.A.) are so erroneous as to be laughable, Press Sec Gibbs is out there today citing "one million jobs saved or created" by the sucker.
 
WTF?
 
Is there anybody in that press room willing to call them on this? Do they spray the room with something first?
 
How stupid do they expect to look before they start to feel used?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The New Enemies List

This is only an unholy surprise to all the Obamaites last year who chose not to dig below the surface of his unflappable image.
 
The few times during the campaign that his forward progress was halted- in the middle of the primaries and in early September- his Chicago roots would begin to show. When he wind is mostly at your back and the mainstream media is cheering you on, there won't be many of those moments.
 
Now Obama is approaching crunch time. Not only is he getting heat over his military posture, but his siimultaneous forays into energy policy, health care, union reform and budget management are all coming to a head. Next year is a campaign year, and everybody in his party knows it will be a damage control year. Everything that is going to get done has to get done now.
 
And in the process, a few declared enemies have cropped up. The Chamber of Commerce and the health insurance industry are almost self-explanatory. Why Fox News?
 
I'll tell you why. It wasn't so much because of the effect they had on Van Jones and ACORN (and oh, boy, did they ever have an effect). It was because the other media made public notice of what they were missing, and started talking about how they would start following up on Fox and where they were going. This was made especially public by the NY Times, who made a point of appointing an Editor for the purpose, whose staff would be responsible for (among other things) monitoring Fox 24-7.
 
What does that mean? It means that the Fox News reporting that has been shunned by many to date will start bleeding into the mainstream on a real time basis. They won't allow that because they think Fox is better- they just see Fox's ratings going through the roof and may need a piece of that to survive.
 
The NY Times still provides copy to the lazy, sloth ridden news staffs at the network news divisions in New York City. I think that this  phenomenon was too much for the White House to tolerate.
 
I told you that Obama was a street thug from Chicago. He surrounded himself with the same. It ain't a surprise to me.
 
So, all of you Obamaites out there, think about this: if he decides to keep going in Afghanistan and doesn't close Gitmo Bay, and his doubletalk rationales stop working with you, when you speak up and protest him, how will you be with him turning on YOU this way?
 
Because he will.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Afghanistan Again

This is an issue that gets more dangerous with each passing day. The request for extra troops made by Obama's hand-picked theater commander in Afghanistan still sits in his in box. Two months now, if I'm not mistaken.
 
And now word is coming out that a decision will be announced- after Election Day. You don't mean the runoff election in Afghanistan? No, I mean the ones in New Jersey and Pennsylvania.
 
So our national security and the safety of our troops in harm's way are a lower priority than political considerations here. Do I have that right? Please, somebody chime in here and show me where I missed out in my reasoning. Educate me.
 
This is coming from someone who may have suspected that the whole Iraq war-bad, Afghanistan war-good thing was a political ploy last year- a wedge issue to beat over Bush and McCain and still stay away from the 'soft on security' problem. Suspected, but willing to give the benefit of the doubt because after the Iraq surge worked, pushing the terrorist elements towards the Pakistan border was a good thing to do. You can hide in the mountains, but you can't train there. Taking Afghanistan away was clearly the next step.
 
Why political motivation? Why would Obama request that the Bush Afghanistan report from the transition remain secret, and then send his Chief of Staff out to the talk shows to pretend that it didn't exist- and Afghanistan was just an untouched swamp that they were left to clean up? If you act that crassly, somebody is bound to call you on it and have it bite you back.
 
When it seems clearer by the day that you are holding up support for the troops so you have a better shot of getting your base out in a couple of elections here, the bite back will be that much harder.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Campaigning

My campaign in my home town is a bit of a shoestring operation. I've been outgunned, outspent and outmanned. His signs are bigger, his supporters are more vocal, his placards are fancier.
 
The grunt work is old hat to me. I've been doing phone work and door to door stuff for other people for years. Being out in the elements, and the damage it can do to your health is nothing I haven't dealt with before.
 
It is the main reason why I took a leave from this blog for almost two weeks. But I am at the end of the first phase. Tomorrow starts early voting, and that's where I'll be planted for the rest of the month.
 
It is inevitable when you are the name on the ballot to be drawn to personalizing this process. You have to keep in mind two things: one, you shouldn't be going into this to get a job. Two, it's not about you, it's about the issues.
 
Anyone who loses track of that should get the hell out. Politics is full of self-centered, movie star wannabes. The ones who are there just to get things done are the ones who usually get things done.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Afghanistan Bananistan

This is farce, and is rapidly turning to tragedy.
 
Obama, you wanted this war. I'm trying like hell to give you the benefit of the doubt on this one, and not believe that you signed onto this county as the "good war" just so you could beat Bush and McCain over the head with Iraq on the campaign trail while staying away from the 'soft on national security' label.
 
You took office and hammered out a startegy for Afghanistan. You handpicked a General to oversee it. You completed (your word) your mission direction last March.
 
Now, six months later, your General, who is one of the world's foremost experts in antiterrorism tactics, tells you that antiterrorism is not the right path, and counterinsurgency is.
 
So, while our people are putting their hides on the line in a situation that everybody agrees is deteriorating, you want to think about it all for another few weeks? I thought you already thought it through?
 
One other thing: your foriegn policy "expert" of a VP was the guy who was promoting breaking Iraq into three ethnic parts while the CentCom was developing the counterinsurgency that worked so well there. Why doesn't Joe have a sock in his mouth yet?
 
Lead, follow or get the hell out of the way. If you don't send him the 40,000 troops, get out entirely. Please don't pull a Solomonic compromise and send a few thousand more in- not enough to get the job done, but more fresh targets for the Taliban.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Comic Relief Hits The White House

Even the smart, hip, urbane Black man finally gets the pinata treatment.
 
It took about six months of well spoken dithering before it became obvious that there was nothing to be seen beyond the dithering.
 
The same week that Jon Stewart rips Obama for not eating anything on his full plate, Saturday Night Live plays out all his non-accomplishments on a report card.
 
It was just a matter of time. Welcome to the real world, Barrack. The bubble you've been living in couldn't last- the Left has been seething here for years, and they will not allow you to sweet talk any more.
 
Your problem is, if you try and deliver an agenda that 30% of the country wants, you will get hell from many of the rest. That is your Town Hall lesson for today.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Ig-Nobel Prize

Let me start by stating that I think Obama was as taken aback by all this as the rest of us were. He showed a genuine humility in accepting something he clearly didn't think he earned yet.
 
The Nobel standards are still there in most of the categories, especially math, the sciences and medicine. The Peace prize has been a joke for over a decade. If Jimmy Carter and Al Gore didn't devalue it, giving it to Yassir Arafat turned it into farce. That was as bad as the UN allowing Libya to sit in on their Human Rights Commision.
 
Liberals here idolize Europeans because they share so many standards. In this case, if your intentions are good, who gives a whit if you've actually accomplished anything? This sort of mentality is what allows hellholes like Bosnia and the Sudan to become bigger hellholes, under direct UN supervision.
 
Because if your heart is in the right place, you can't possibly be held responsible for genocide, right?
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Chicago Olympics

The Obamaite wet dream has ended. They were so hoping for a world forum here in 2016 that Barrack and Michelle could preside over in the last year of his second term. What a glorious and expensive coronation it would have been.

I'm not really with the critics who panned him for jetting to Copenhagen- they would have done better for themselves, I think, if they stuck to the most salient reason- Obama is starting to suffer a national security credibility problem, made worse with the news that he has been on national TV for health care about five dozen times as many as his conferences with the Afghan theater General who has been asking for more troops for months now.
 
Obama did not lose the Olympics, though. The United States has an inherent disadvantage when it presents to the IOC an American city Olympic budget, competeing with countries. Rio, like China, can build whatever it wants for the games and whatever residents are in the area will scoot to elsewhere with nary a thought about eminent domain and "I need a lawyer". They also laid out a budget proposal that outspent Chicago by a factor of four. Money talks as well in South America as it does here.
 
I think the other reason is that, like almost four billion other residents of the planet, the IOC hotel had TV sets that carried two tidbits from Chicago newsfeeds: a poll showing that almost half the local residents expressed a desire for having nothing to do with the Olympics and two, the tragic video of an honor student getting fatally beaten by thugs with railroad ties. Someone from China should talk to Mayor Daley about keeping the streets quiet when you need to. Then again, his elder tried to do that at the 1968 Democrat convention, and look how THAT turned out.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The NY Times "Missed" The ACORN Story

The response to which is to create an Editor/ Ombudsman position to keep track of things that may be passing under the radar there.
 
Oh, and get this, folks: one of the stated duties of the office there is to keep a constant monitor on the Fox News channel! Do they realize that such a thing is a tacit admission of their incompetence as a news gatherer?
 
Earth to Grey Lady on 43rd Street: what demographic do you think is out there that will buy into this spin?
 
Here's my take from the street. You knew the story was out there. I know many Democrats in my State who knew full well what was going on, and the damage it was doing to the ACORN organization. The more partisan among them regarded it as some sort of illegitimate entrapment situation, but they knew what was going on, as it was happening.
 
This leads me to the conclusion that it was the Times editorial policy that was dictating the news that "fit" for the day, which clearly is in line with the decline of what used to be a great newspaper.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Rape-Rape?

Roman Polanski's life has gone all to hell because Switzerland has obviously decided that it honors a few more extradition laws than it did previously. The talented Director (Chinatown is one of my all time favorites) is now in legal limbo.
 
And some here, most visibly in the Hollywood set, are doing their best to set up a moral statute of limitations for him. This all can be used as a textbook definition of moral relativism. On the surface, what Mr.Polanski did to a thirteen year old girl was beyond the pale. In this case, when you dig into the details, I think that conclusion is inescapable.
 
But the grand prize winner today has to be Whoopi Goldberg: “I know it wasn’t rape-rape. I think it was something else, but I don’t believe it was rape-rape.”
 
I can't begin to understand the premises behind that one, without running smack into my right/ wrong wall that I learned from my parents, and am trying to pass to my children. Stuff like this is so prevalent today, I am no longer astonished. But I refuse to accept it as the least bit legitimate because my television now makes it ubiquitous.
 
Did I say "stuff"? Sorry, wrong word choice.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Fixing The Game Of Baseball

This is not the first time I've addressed this subject, but after watching some good teams play out 3 hour+ marathons, I must come back to it. This addresses three of the great pitching revolutions that are religion today. First, the five man pitching rotation started by Gil Hodges and Rube Walker in 1968 with the NY Mets. Second, the advent of pitch counts in the late '80's. Last, also in the '80's, the use of a stopper/ closer relief pitcher for no more than one inning a game.
 
Of these three, research that I've seen bears out the rationality of only one: holding a pitcher to a limited pitch count (100-110 a game) and then rehabbing the pitcher's arm properly afterwards prevents a lot of short and long term damage. The same research shows that, given the proper rehab, there is virtually no performance difference on three or four days rest.
 
That means that, if you are not abusing a starting pitcher's arm on their rotation day, you should be easily able to run a four man rotation instead of the now standard five.
 
The use of closers for one inning only comes from two things: an overreaction to abuses of some good pitchers a few decades ago (most notably Bruce Sutter) and the onset of the three run or less rule for the glory statistic, "saves".
 
I think your best two relievers should not be chasing saves, but coming in when they have the most game impact- one run down, tied or one run up (two runs down if you have a great offense), and used for two innings, not just one. The same research shows that using a pitcher in relief for just over 100 innings a year, if not abused on game day, doesn't change performance from a constant one inning use.
 
What does that add up to? Let's chalk it out:
 
                                     5 Man Rotation, 1 inning Relief         4 Man Rotation, 2 inn. Relief
                                       Starts   Innings Pitched                          Starts    Innings Pitched
                   Starter 1        32         230                                          36         260
                   Starter 2        32         210                                          36         240
                   Starter 3        30         190                                          34         220
                   Starter 4        26         160                                          30         180
 
                                        Games  Innings Pitched                         Games  Innings Pitched
                 Reliever 1        60          80                                           50          110
                 Reliever 2        50          60                                           50          100
 
                                       Total Starts/ Total IP                             Total Starts/ Total IP
                                        120         930                                        136        1110
 
That's an estimated total of 180 innings more, or 20 full games a season, being thrown by the top pitchers on the team.
 
That means at least one less pitching change per game. It means less 30 pitch innings tossed up by guys who should be in the minor leagues. It means less runs scored, all of which translates into games that average a half hour less than the three hours they do now. The only people that lose out on that are the networks, who have learned to bank on the extra ad revenue. Oh, and all the hitters that pad their numbers up by teeing off on the frag arms that teams are left with to get through the sixth and seventh innings. The guys this program would ship back to AAA ball.
 
It also means carrying one less pitcher on the 25 man team roster, freeing up a slot for another position player.
 
But baseball people are creatures of habit. Walker and Hodges went to the five man rotation on a last place team, meaning they had nothing to lose. They won the World Series the following year on dominant pitching, and the world took notice. Having nothing to lose, a good idea and some talent to make it work is a rare combination.
 
The first people to try it will make out like bandits for at least one glorious season.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Troops In Afghanistan

Here's one I'm having trouble understanding:
 
Health care reform is needed right now! People will die unnecessarily unless we get this through the Capitol and on Obama's desk for signature before the Congressional recess in August.
 
Climate change is upon us, and is an immediate problem! If we don't do cap and trade right now, the damage to the environment will be incalculable.
 
This is all from Administration and direct Presidential statements from this Summer.
 
The Pentagon put in a troop request for Afghanistan in it's formal fashion on August 30th. The CentCom people are unanimous that this is an immediate need, and the mission in Afghanistan is dependent on acting. The White House has announced it needs more time to study the problem.
 
Why? Are you still trying to figure out what the mission is? Surely it can't be because you can't handle this request and health care at the same time. I gather that from how candidate Obama roundly accused McCain of being unable to multi-task and handle the economic collapse and a Presidential debate simultaneously, during the campaign last October.
 
Or is it that the needs of the men in uniform takes second place to your political needs here?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous123456789102122Next »