About Me

Name: Bill Crawford
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

Eric Holder, Idiot

I had a whole fistful of concerns about Mr. Holder, walking into the nomination for this job. His recommendation for the pardon of Marc Rich in 2001, for starters. That one smelled like fresh cut carnations compared with the concurrent pardon of F.A.L.N. terrorists- which so conveniently helped out in gathering money and votes for Hillary's first run for Senate.
 
This week, in one outburst, he adds two more gems. he states that Justice Department employees "have a special responsibility to advance racial understanding". Really? I thought they were there to enforce the law. Now they are social workers! How nice.
 
But the kewpie doll winner was the notion that we come home from work on Saturday and Sunday and retreat into our comfort zones on racial issues. He says we are a "nation of cowards" on race.
 
This wouldn't be the first time this notion has been raised to my face. I usually react by simply walking away, because when this line of reasoning is raised by any race, it is usually directed first and foremost at a member of the majority.
 
Occasionally, though, the speaker summons up a combination of arrogance and/or obnoxiousness that warrants me hanging around long enough to flip him the bird. Not one of those casual ones, mind you, but lingering and close enough for him to tell that you don't go out for manicures often.
 
Is that a constructive way to continue a conversation? My answer to that is, what conversation? If you follow his premises, he is not opening a dialogue. He is presenting a lecture, and he has already determined the truth for all of us. Whatever racial conversation he wants us to use Black History Month to inspire, it is only on the terms HE is setting in advance.
 
If this is the way he runs the Justice Department, Lord help us all.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Oscar Night Back To Predictability

One of the "traditions" we lived through in New York was the Oscar party, hosted by friends of ours. Sadly, he ended up in a job working the graveyard shift, and that routine died. While it was alive, though, I was usually at or near the top of the prediction list that we would all compete on.
 
This was never because of my cinematic acumen. It was always about the predictability of the oh-so-obvious Hollywood population.
 
Over the last decade, a new generation of Academy voters has taken charge of how the group hands out membership. The standards were somewhat stricter, and they were gravitated more towards the producer than the actor. This changed the same-ol', same-ol' enough where I was caught by surprise a few times in the years hence.
 
Now that this pattern has solidified, the predictability is back. So here goes:
 
Slumdog Millionaire. Mickey Rourke. Kate Winslet. Heath Ledger. Penelope Cruz. It's like taking candy from a baby.
 
It's all about their values, which also derives their politics. It is why Clint Eastwood can become the pre-eminent Director of our times, sweep everything on Oscar night a decade ago depicting a troubled gunfighter regretting his lifestyle ("Unforgiven"), and getting totally snubbed this year in an even more mature flick about a racist who finds redemption with (at least in part) the use of an M-1 lying around the house ("Gran Torino").
 
Hollywood will continue to put out product I can find inspiration from. They will even occasionally find me dropping jaw in astonishment, which is the state you would have found me in after the first wordless half hour of "Wall-E".
 
But when the average denizen of that town puts their values on the screen, you would probably make more money betting on the thing not making money than the Producers ever will. It's a sick town in the center of the flakiest basin of the craziest state in the union.
 
Editor's Note: It looks like  only hit four out of five. I should have known that Sean Penn playing up a gay icon from San Francisco should have been the better bet. What on Earth was I thinking?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Market Votes Again

The stock markets are not political animals. They have anthracite hearts and vote with the money. You have no choice when you are working with OPM (other people's money).
 
The stimulus plan is effectively public in it's near final form. There are few surprises left. The Treasury plans for TARP are on the table, in their pathetic still born state.
 
The Dow sticks around the 7700-8100 floor that it has held since the reaction to the Lehman Brothers failure went down five months ago. If the plans are so well devised and good for us all, where is their confidence in this great new administration?
 
This White House follows it's disdain for supply side economics with a micro-managing mentality and a dabbling in the old Keynsian thoeries of aggregate demand that have been playing out in the more liberal econ schools since FDR.
 
Obama, like Clinton, thinks any talk of tax cuts should be topical, targeted and time-limited. They don't understand that the players in the market, just like all the families out there, don't make any long term decisions on short term stimulus. A family that gets a one shot rebate of $1000 in taxes will couch them conservatively. The same family that gets promised that much every year until the law changes again will then have the confidence to create the demand that Obama is hoping for.
 
The same goes for how the market reacts to structured changes in the capital gains tax. Long term changes beget long term plans. Uncertainty breed cash hoarding.
 
The market will continue to sit on their cash positions until they know where this White House ends up in policy. Only then will the stock market rebound and the credit markets loosen up significantly.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The New TARP does what?

The original thought of Secretary Paulson last year was to use public money to neutralize what most agreed was the center of the economic maelstrom, the bad mortgages. his was the modus operandi that drove Congress to allow the rapid and (even by their standards) uncontrolled dispersal of the better part of a trillion dollars into the banking industry.
 
And the bankers have done a wonderful job of announcing to the world that, while thankful for the money, they weren't about to change their habits at all.
 
Which leads to two concurrent political tragedies being played out as we speak. First, a "stimulus" bill which is supposed to counter the crisis at hand. If the second coming of TARP is supopsed to re-address the mortgage question, what the hell is the stimulus bill for? Obama has left a considerable amount of poliical capital on the table for this, and is already starting to pay for it. First, his rhetoric about raising hope over fear flies in the face of him giving ominous warnings of permanent ruination if this bill is not passed. Second, his talk about being a post-partisan President belies his negotiating tactics with Republicans, which have been ham-handed and almost dictatorial. Third, his promises of transparency fly in the face of the bill being negotiated behind closed doors, often only with Democrats in the room.
 
The other tragedy is pushing the need for speed on the new TARP appropriation, and then sending out a 'deer in the headlights' Treasury Secretary to try and sell it by admitting that nobody really knows how they are going to use the money yet. They want the money now, and the specifics will be coming "soon". How's that? This is the man that had to be nominated even though he couldn't navigate Turbo Tax?
 
Who the hell is in charge here? Every time Obama, Reid and Pelosi look in the mirror, they all see the answer to that question. All I see is a witches brew that has just enough votes to be enacted into disaster.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The First Hundred Days

I've been off this for a week, and in times like this, that can be a lifetime. Obama is a man in a hurry, and for good reason. He knows that his time to act without the sludge of his checks and balances is fleeting.
 
George Will educated me this week. He said that the first Western reference to the "hundred days" was not the whirlwind of FDR taking office, but the time between when Napoleon Bonaparte escaped Elba until the Battle of Waterloo. This is ostensibly to teach that the frenzy does not always reap rewards, I suppose.
 
At any rate, there are a number of factions out there in America that have been in the wilderness for a long time who feel they have a friend in Obama and a better opportunity than they will again for a long time to act.
 
Unions: Membership in the private sector has been declining for years, for a number of reasons. The union leaders and their supporters are convinced that it is largely because of workplace intimidation, and are itching to find ways to structure the law to counter that. The fact that the declination has been due more to changes in the workplace, especially in the transition from manufacturing to service to information is lost on most of them. The fact that even the Obama people know by this point that the auto bailouts will go no farther until the UAW is reigned in is lost on them, too. They will strive to get the "card check" laws passed and may well do it, but will run into a wall in company after company, especially in the right to work states.
 
Gays: These people have been itching to go past the nominal accommodations like inheritance, hospital visiting rights, insurance dependents, etc., into a full blown equal rights movement, capped off with the right to marry, which has been denied to them in large parts of the country. They think that this is a modern day corollary of the civil rights movement, as if the color of one's skin was akin to one's behavior. They may actually get this done in some more states than they already have, but will not get their agenda of using the full faith and credit provision of the Constitution to make it national law. They will attempt to wait for a couple of Obama Supreme Court appointments to try and do a Roe v. Wade, but the reality there is that just as O'Connor retired after Bush took office, the conservatives on the court are younger than their counterparts and will try to stick it out until Obama is gone. His first two appointments are likely to be replacements of a similar ideology.
 
The Education Industry:  Also tied intrinsically with the union phenomenon, these people have been choking at the bit for over a decade to untie themselves from the yokes placed on them by legislative bodies. Starting with No Child Left Behind, which they regard as a leash on their abilities. They also want to use this time to trample all questions of vouchers and charter schools into the graveyard. This will not work because the ongoing experiments are succeeding in many states. It will also run into a wall because of the state of public education in most of our larger cities, which is usually as pathetic as it is expensive.
 
The Anti-War Coalition: These people will be the most frustrated of all for two reasons. First, Obama aunderstands that our security position in the world is something that, if he goes too far, will be jeapordized in a way that will shut him down politically. He also is nowhere near a civil libertarian and actually likes government power, which is why he consistently voted for extensions of the FISA laws, even while he chided Bush for doing it. This administration may move thier core priorites to Afghanistan, but they will not be able to leave Iraq. They also will not be able to untie themselves from Isreal's problems with Hamas, Hezbollah and Iran (especially with the recent resurrection of the Likkud party), nor will they find a solution for Guantanamo.
 
The Fairness Doctrine: This is a movement to find a creative way to punish conservative public communication. This is a cruel joke, because if they think in a world of a thousand avenues of information dispersal, they can shut down the conservative voice by charter, they are sorely mistaken. Fox News will continue to broadcast despite their best efforts and so will some variant of talk radio. The Right just won't get to ask any questions at White House press conferences before Helen Thomas.
 
There are others, especially those who don't believe in supply side economics, but those who I think are of any significance I will deal with in other tomes.
 
What it comes down to is that Obama has revealed his limitations in announcing to the world that he has no control over his own party.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama's New "Culture Of Corruption"

Gosh, that's a bit unfair, isn't it? I mean, give the poor guy a chance!
 
No, for a couple of reasons. First, Conservatives get smacked in the head all the time for morals issues, they being perceived as hypocrisy a priori because they are the "family values" party. This is why Bill Clinton could use the oval office as a whorehouse and remain in office. Liberals pose themselves as the ethical versions of the virgin birth all the time, and they get kicked in the head that much faster as a result.
 
Secondly, Barrack spent an inordinate amount of time on the campaign trail carping about the state of things in Washington, in the White House and in McCain's campaign. He was going to "change" all that.
 
Now he is finding that it is really hard to filll an administration with the talent he needs without coming up against the same ol', same ol' of revolving door lobbyists, tax cheats and ethics lapses. In the tax cheat cases, they are serving a party and a philosophy where the well-to-do are supposed to do their patriotic best to fork over their full share of tax money to fund the government for all those who are there to benefit from Obamas "net tax cut".
 
Things got so bad by the time poor Tommy Daschle got there that the new President did his best 'buck stops here' song and dance.
 
Sorry again, how is "I screwed up" a song and dance? Listen to the follow-on explanation- a lament about how Daschle was still the best man for the job, which is why he originally passed him up to the Senate. The vetting people knew about his tax problems, and so did the President. You see, he is on a special mission from God, and he needs to be above his own rules at times. Like, whenever he deems them necessary.
 
That is because, like many others on the Left, Barrack is a moral relativist. He feels no compunction about being consistent. Whatever it takes. Whatever Barrack thinks is needed, today. If tommorow calls for something else, so what?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama Finally Shows What He's Got

Many moons ago, I had a friend who played baseball for a mid-level college team. They were due to face a left handed pitcher who had a bit of a fearsome reputation- good fastball, phenomenal breaking stuff, etc. Rumor had it that there were major league scouts following him around.
 
Everybody was getting the hives worrying about this guy. When game time came, the first three batters went down, but his stuff turned out to be not much better than what they had seen in many games they had already played. They looked up and down the dugout and agreed that this guy was nothing special, and could be taken.
 
Which brings us to Obama The Great. Obama the Grand Promiser. Obama the Unifier. Obama the Bringer of the New Age.
 
There would have to come a time when he passed from talking about what he was going to do to actually doing it.
 
So what did he do? He spent some time listening to the GOP caucus, and threw them a couple of bones- for instance, no Pelosi funding for birth control. But tax cuts? Sorry. What did he get from the Republicans? Bupkus. Zero. Nada.
 
The Democrats loaded the bill up with earmarks as if they were invented last week. Obama didn't even make an effort to stop them.
 
Two things have become obvious. First, the GOP has decided that the Democrats own this, and they don't want any part of it. They will not sign on to anybody in the White House labelling this as "bipartisan".
 
More importantly, he obviously does not control his own party on Capitol Hill. This is critical. He will have to govern, at least in part, as Pelosi and Reid demand he does. This, if he doesn't rein them in soon, will be the kiss of death for him.
 
If this all passes, and the economy doesn't get much better by the 2010 elections, Obama may walk out of that with far fewer numbers on the Hill than he has now.
 
Judging from his words, I don't understand why he would let that happen, not without at least a fight. His biggest obstacle to immortality is his own party.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Gore's New Catch Words

Al Gore was more than happy to sign on to the Clinton administration's eternal search for better focus group tested phrases, to better sell their policies.
 
This is where government spending became "investments", and GOP opposition became the "Republican tax scheme", which was retired after the 2000 Presidential debates when focus groups essentially told Gore's staffers, "enough with the schemes, already".
 
Now, when the Nobel Prize winning environmentalist enters the capital to prattle on anew about global warming, it becomes obvious that his focus groups have told him that the ones from the northern half of the country (where most of his support comes from) have been suffering from huge snowfalls and bitter cold since last November.
 
So into the compactor goes "global warming". The latest and greatest terminology is "climate change".
 
The rest of it hasn't changed at all. The cause of said climate change is still decidedly anthropomorphic- man can't predict the weather, but he sure as hell can change it radically (I'm still trying to figure that one out).
 
Also, the hinge of history is.......oh, my God! It's right now! Last year, the critical year was 2008. Now, it's 2009. This "flat earther" (Gore doubter) wonders if Gore realizes he is starting to sound like the bearded sidewalk denizens in Los Angeles with the "The End Is Near!" signs on their shoulder.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Iran Shows Us A New Side

Now that Ahmadinejad and Obama are pen pals, we are on a bright new path, brimming with hope.

We follow the letter of congratulations to our new President from Iran with Obama saving his first TV interview for an Arab network.
 
There he was in all out glory, bragging on whatever Muslim was in his background, and ragging the previous administration as if he were speaking to a group of primary voters in West Virginia. Brilliant!
 
And what is the Itranian response to this? One: a demanded pullback of all our troops in the region. Two: a demand for an apology for all our past criminal behavior against Iran. Three: another tirade about the evil "Zionism" in the region.
 
There is your "reboot", Mr. President. You hold your chin out so they can slap it. And, while Hillary resets the State Department to go back to negotiation mode, these creeps get some more time to test their missile capacity and continue to refine fissle material to weapons grade.
 
Way to go. On the campaign trail, that was naive. In the White House, that is so dangerous as to deserve the label "Learning Impaired".
 
How long will it take President Learning Impaired to realize that we are at war?
 
Editor's Note: those of you out there who are taken aback of me ripping the learning disabled by connecting them somehow to Obama are now required to toggle the "Flag As Offensive" icon.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

This is "Stimulus"?

That's all there is? $250 billion of tax refunds (on next year's tax return)? That is, EITC extensions for people who don't pay any federal taxes, posed as tax cuts. That is, taking the whole group of stipends and labelling it a "net tax cut". This is what you get when a lawyer is in charge.
 
What is the rest? A giant pork program. Go look at it, it ain't hard to find. Subsidies for smoking cessation programs. Birth control programs. General funding for "education", without any time or stipulation.
 
And what happens when you question all this? You get a lecture about how people are hurting. How thousands are being laid off as we speak. And if an enterprising reporter asks how a smoking cessation program is going to help the newly jobless, we all aren't "looking at the big picture".
 
This is all there is to the Obama magic? After all the carping and moaning about Bush's deficit spending, to load us for another trillion dollars full of Democrat Congressional pork, and then do the Obama soft shoe song and dance about his concern for the downtrodden?
 
Oh, yeah, that's enough for me. I learned my lesson from Paulson last year. The original stimulus was supposed to be a fund that would target the bad mortgage assets in the credit industry, the notion being that once those assets were neutralized, the balance sheets would normalize. This actually made a bit of sense.
 
So we shovelled a few hundred billion dollars at them, and we weren't allowed to even ask how they spent it.
 
So now you want more? Screw that! Pardon me for being un-American, but I'm not up to putting any money in Obama's hat.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The World Versus Rush

And the Congress erupts in offended fervor against one radio commentator.
 
Obama the salesman has created a personal cult that attaches him to the future of America. I guess he is sort of like the old Japanese Emporer, a divinity set to earth for the sake of all humanity.
 
To dare to stand up against this is now akin to holding up money from the poor folks and the l'il children. This must be the post-partisan world that Obama promised us all. Ye who disagree with me shall be trivialized. All debate must cease now, because we have important things to do. Hell, isn't what this what George W. was accused of?
 
But that is parlor in light of the real game afoot here: this is about the resurrection of the Fairness Doctrine, only it gets more narrowly focused with every passing week. At this point, it is about taking the radio spectrum and mandating that it carry a certain percentage of "local issues"- which is a way of demanding that, for every hour that Rush rails about Washington D.C., an hour must be devoted to school board hearings and pothole reports.
 
That's the Democrat way. If you can't beat 'em, silence 'em. They're just following the Karl Rove precedent of using federal power to silence Air America. I'm sorry, if memory serves, Rove thought they were pathetic and offered to help fund them.
 
Welcome to the new world. As it was when Clinton took power with his party holding Congress, these people have no leash on themselves.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

This Is What You'll Get

So Obama wants to close the Guantanamo facility, as soon as he can figure out what to do with the 250 pack rats there.
 
There are consequences we are already dealing with from the misguided fealty we've been paying to the ACLU breeders here. There are at least 60 former detainees out there right now, battling us again through the organizations they left from.
 
Yesterday's NY Times held a front page article yesterday that was short on definitive conclusions, but passing one cogent observation.
 
It seems that Said Ali al-Shiri was released to Saudi Arabia in 2007 from Gitmo. Now he has been nnnounced as the deputy leaader of Al Quaeda in Yemen.
 
Is this how we fight a war? I must remember to send a thank you note to Mssrs. Pelosi and Reid.
 
In 1942, a hatful of German military donned civilian clothes, got off a submarine near the end of Long Island and took a train into New York City, ostensibly to blow up a device there that they were lugging along with their bag lunches.
 
The plot got foiled. They were captured. A couple among them gave up their pals under interrogation (they weren't given doughnuts and coffee). In August, 1944, they finished passing through a military tribunal and most of them were executed.
 
THAT is how you fight a war. War is hell. If you don't make hell, you soon live in it. It really is very simple.
 
I hope the reality of that is not "above the pay grade" of our new President.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Ill Wind From Illinois

The Blago hurricane blows again yesterday, this time attempting to build a populist case for himself when he knows the State Senate is quite likely to unemploy him, sooner rather than later.
 
So he blathers about how the upcoming impeachment trial is not going to be "fair" to him. He isn't allowed to call witnesses. Actually, that ain't quite true. He can do so through Senate proxies. He just can't run his end of the trial as if he were the defense in a legal court.
 
Here is the bigger thing, and I can only assume he is bright enough to know that: the job he holds is not a right, but a privilege, and the rules that the Senate set up for an impeachment trial are NOT required to uphold your Constitutional rights as a citizen.
 
It is the difference between your rights as a home owner, and those of a driver (which is a privilege requiring a lisence). What the police can ask of you when you are in your car and what they can ask you in your home are two radically different things.
 
Blago will not go away. He probably won't even go willingly when the cane comes out side stage and anchors to his neck. From where I stand, he is a cartoon figure. If I lived in Illinois, I imagine I'd be finding ways to help him get the hint that somebody has pulled the welcome mat for the duration.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

We Elected Another Lawyer

I warned all of you about this guy. He ain't a civil libertarian.
 
After signing an order to close the Gitmo facility, "within one year", IF they can ever figure out what to do with the animals they are feeding three meals a day to there, he signs another one to order all personnel (including CIA) to follow the Army Field Manual when dealing with captured terrorists.
 
That is, until you read the fine print. It also creates a commission to study whether those softie methods are sufficient "when employed by departments or agencies outside the military". Ain't that sweet?
 
Obama is a crafty guy. He knows that if he gets an incident here after seven years of Bush silence, he's dead meat. He wants to keep his options open.
 
And his Press Secretary gets to hold up the first few paragraphs to the world and announce that America is travelling down a new, civilized path.
 
I'm not going to hold my breath waiting for David Gregory to start hammering administration people on this funny loophole. Obama, after all, is a unifier. He unifies all those who agree with him.
 
So, to you conservatives out there: the guy in charge doesn't seem to be above waterboarding, if that is what is needed. Being as far from a civil libertarian as you'll find in politics, he will need a much tighter leash than Bush ever did.
 
All you Obamaites: get used to the fact that he is a lawyer, and a sneaky little putz, so confident in his speaking skills that he can keep all of you in honeymoon mode while he does whatever the hell he wants.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

My New Entertainment

A little history is in order here.
 
1998: the wascally Republicans impeach a President. They thought it was because he lied to a grand jury willfully. No, it was "all about sex". I was told by many people that there was hoing to be hell to pay for this. I consider this event to be the leadoff of the great schism today between the counterculture left and the culture right.
 
2000: George Bush uses the Clinton appointments on the Supreme Court to steal a national election. The title "President-Select" is monikered, and the hatred level rises even more.
 
2002: Bush uses his campaigning endorsements to retake the Senate, including sending Tom Daschle packing for home, all after setting us up for an illegal and immoral war. Blood pressures reach critical limits.
 
2004: Bush gets re-elected through the immoral use of source codes in voting machines in Ohio, and increases House and Senate majorities along the way. The left is apoplectic.
 
2006: The Republicans engage in a civil war over immigration and allow the Democrats to take over the House and the Senate. Nancy Pelosi gets in front of an open mike the next day and says, "Let's be clear on this. The election was a referendum on the war in Iraq". Six months later, we were not only still there, but they were still being fnnded! The left was going nuts.
 
2008: The messiah gets elected, along with larger majorities in both Houses. He will sign an order to close Gitmo and strike an agreement with Iraq on an orderly withdrawal- and ask the left for patience on both.
 
My question is, when nothing changes a year from now, will the left have heads that finally vibrate and explode, like a scene from "Scanners"? What will it take before the words have no more meaning? When will he be held accountable for his (in)actions?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive