About Me

Name: Bill Crawford
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

Wisconsin Soon To Boil Over

Well, as Obama was fond of saying in early 2009, "elections have consequences". Or was that Rahm Emanuel? I do know that Obama closed off a health care conference with a Republican caucus that year with "...but remember, we won the election".
 
I guess that doesn't matter any more. The Wisconsin Senate Democrats bailed out of state weeks ago, in order to prevent a quorum. It was just a matter of time before some parliamentarian wizard found a way around that one. Hell, they should have hired Chuck Schumer, he would have come up with something sooner than this.
 
The reports were zinging all through the right side of the blogosphere today that Governor Walker was about to compromise with the Democrats. Evidently, he was doing the outreach thing, and getting little or nothing back. I have heard reports all over the map on this one, so I won't presume to sum them up. At any rate, Walker decided at some point this afternoon that he wasn't getting anywhere, and he hauled out the heavy artillery.
 
So the Republicans stripped the collective bargaining legislation of any spending provisions, and the quorum rule no longer applied. They voted, and that was that. The funny thing is, these were granted by a past legislature, but upon arrival somehow became inalienable rights on the level of life and liberty in the U.S. Constitution.
 
The point is, two things are going to happen soon. One is that the Wisconsin Senate Democrats do not have any reason to hole up like Saddam Hussein in the spider hole, and will return as fast as their carpools can get them back to Madison. They will then join in a boiling circus that will make the last few weeks look like an assisted-living bridge match.
 
You see, they have run over grandma and crushed all the apple pies. Collective bargaining is now Norman Rockwell Americana and anybody who speaks otherwise is an infidel. Enjoy the respite. The news will go forth tonight, and fevers will rise like influenza by sunrise.
 
I understand that some of that vitriole will end up in my lap. I'm long past caring about it. That isn't the point. The point is, this has to be done, if we are going to ever crawl out of the hole so many states are in.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Public Unions Vs. Taxpayers, Round 1

So anyway, as always, I'm hooked into just about everything. That is to say, I am on gobs of e-mail and update lists. In the eternal political campaign world, I get feeds from both ends of the spectrum.
 
And this Wisconsin conflagration is bringing out the twitter-happies. My gosh, my inbox went from half capacity to over 80% full in less than two weeks. This stuff is coming from all over the country. Most of it is from the left, and it is laced with similarities, almost like they are being fed talking points and spitting them out. That is probably happening on a certain level, but there is also a great deal of original work.
 
The similarities have to do with one form of deflection or another. The union workers aren't making out as well as you think. The unions have made many sacrifices in this economy. The unions are not the enemy. Statistical studies. Income averaging models. And polling? I've been overwhelmed with polling.
 
The Republicans have overreached. The unions are filled with your neighbors. Government workers are people, too. (Wow. You think? That hadn't occured to me before.) The war is over, and the Tea Party has already lost.
 
Well, here's the thing, folks. The Tea Party people were not elected in numbers that made them unstoppable. This is not a done deal. But they will maintain their vigil on this issue, and if the Republicans back down, there will be hell to pay for them in 2012- and they all know this. That is a choice Governor's Walker and Kasich will have to make, along with Boehner.
 
That choice being, who will finally start dealing with the debt? At the fed level, that means restructuring the entitlements. At the state level, it means dealing with the public employee base. There is no getting around that. If the powers that be accept Wisconsin style one-time concessions and the structure is left in place to continue the spiral when nobody is paying attention, it is back to square one.
 
There is nothing but public grief for the GOP with this- and they know that, too. Obama is more than happy to let them make the calls and then have ten million union types paint them as the ones who ran your grandmother over and killed public education. I've been hearing that crap for years, and for positions a lot tamer than what is on the table now. So, what of it?
 
It is time to buck up and take it. Anybody who came to Washington to start a career is not a conservative. Take the hits and leave in six years. The Tea Parties will find a replacement. You can't make peace with these people and deal with the mounting debt.
 
In two years, it will either be the public unions or the taxpayers. The unions will be retiring more modestly than they thought, or we will be well on our way to a new Swedish tax state. It's one or the other. Make your choice, and take a side.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

If I like It, It Should Be The Law.

That, I'm afraid is the standard that ends up coming out of the mouths of too many Americans. Some of them may not understand the implications of what they say, but they still end up in the same place.
 
So let's try an exercise, just for fun. Congress passes the Defense of Marriage Act in 1996, with considerable bipartisan support. The President signs it into law. In 2011, Obama's Justice Department announces that it is unconstitutional, and will not be defended by the government in court.
 
Okay, now let's try another scenario. In 1964, Congress passes the Civil Rights Act with considerable bipartisan support. The President signs it into law. In 1968, George Wallace is elected President and two years later, he announces that the Civil Rights Act is unconstitutional (probably citing the 10th amendment) and his Justice Department will not act on it's basis anymore.
 
If you have a problem with both, you might well be a Constitutional originalist. If you have a problem with one and not the other, you are more likely to be a straight partisan.
 
If you take my concern for the law here and interpret it as an oblique way to hammer gay marriage, you are hopeless.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Newest Cultural Divide

Same phenomenon, different venue. The great culture war has just dug a new trench. This has been a long time coming. And within two years, we will either be paying taxes like Swedes or a lot of public union members are going to be retiring more modestly than they expected.
 
They realize they have a public relations problem, and many of my contacts from that side are throwing talking points my way, many of the convoluted and statistical. If you factor out x and y, the gap isn't that bad. It's apples and oranges.
 
Well, welcome to the trenches. The talking points aren't going to work. The private sector has taken a hell of a hit in the last three years. Through employment, through home prices, through credit shrinkages- in measures that the public sector hasn't seen. You can argue that all you want, but it is still a perception that is near universal in the private sector.
 
In the public sector, you have had decades of employees using their organizing privileges to build a symbiotic relationship with government.  With urban governments that have been largely Democrat since the New Deal, giving union contributions (funded by dues) that even more largely go to Democrats. Management gives more money to Labor, and gets a steady vote from them in the deal.
 
Part of the counter argument is that business is a Republican bastion. Well, not any more, folks. The bigger the business, the more likely it looks to Democrats now. Just for starters, the auto companies would just LOVE to have the government take over health care and free them from paying health benefits to their retirees.
 
The anarchy in the Mid East will affect us much more in the long run, but this pension and collective bargaining thing is a survival issue for a very loud, very opinionated group of people, aided by a sympathetic media. I hope they all packed some extra lunches in Madison- this is going to be a long, long battle.
 
Being a core issue on both sides ("my money"), it's also going to engender a bit of blood. I've already started to avoid some friends and family a bit more than usual. But it will be a cleansing fight, after all is said and done. Even if it makes one wonder where all the talk of civility went after the Jeffords shooting. If you don't believe me, go to the "One Wisconsin" website ( http://www.facebook.com/#!/onewisconsinnow ) and take a gander at the good wishes for Governor Walker.
 
Yeah, good luck with that one. How the hell are you supposed to have a public idea discussion, with people talking like that?
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Three Directions At Once

The first batch of craziness (and the most amusing) comes out of Chicago. Rahm Emanuel gets to be Mayor, after all. He proved that he was a "resident" by furnishing pictures of his luggage sitting in the basement of a rental house. That's right: proved-residence-luggage-rental. Hell, folks, it's the Windy City. Nobody follows the rules forever, not even the ones they make up.
 
At any rate, Obama now has a dependable, go-to guy in his political root basin. No longer must he depend on Blago-type flakeboards to get things done. Rahm will serve as the ringmaster of the first billion dollar Presidential campaign next year. That's not a combined total, the billion dollars is Obama's campaign alone. You think you've had enough of him on TV now? You wait.
 
At least things are relatively peaceful in Illinois, where the Democrat Governor is balancing the budget the RIGHT way, by raising taxes on everybody in sight. This means also that he is a safe bet not to sic the Troopers on outside Legislator's holing up at the Red Roof, so it is now a sanctuary state for visitors from Wisconsin and Indiana.
 
The circus is just getting started in Indiana- Governor Daniels has just been sworn in. In Wisconsin, they are playing hardball. If they don't come back and form a quorum soon, they will lay off the 5000 or so that it will take to balance the budget. Governor Walker has also cut off direct deposit for the Legislature. If they want to get paid, they will have to come home. There is much more to this story, and it will be the center of my next entry here.
 
The third story is the scariest. Egypt has made a garden party out of an overthrow, but in other areas of the Middle East and Africa, the grass roots uprisings are meeting more classic government reactions. In Libya, Khaddafi has strapped himself to the ship of state for life ("I am the revolution!") and has ordered air strikes on his own people. He is threatening to sabotage his oil pipelines and cut off his exports.
 
I will not rip Obama for his inaction here- I don't think there is anything he could do, even if he tried. His smaller failure on this will be his military response, if one is needed there. I'm fairly sure he is still not comfortable with the projection of military power, and will thereby take his usual two or three days to mull things over when RFN (right now) is called for.
 
Here is where it will affect us all. The price of oil starts with events and filters through commodities brokers, who tend to hedge- which is why sweet crude is north of $100 a barrel right now. If oil flow slows or stops, if the Suez Canal or the Strait of Hormuz become battlegrounds, if any half-wit moron (like Iran maybe) tries to take advantage of the chaos, oil could easily start heading for $150 a barrel, and we will be choosing between dinner and driving a lot more than we will want to. $4 a gallon gas ended in a couple of months in 2008 because the Chinese stopped hoarding it after their Olympics ended. This could go on a lot longer, and we will have to learn to live with $5 a gallon and up.
 
The fact that this would all be unpleasant is not news. The reconnection in everyone's mind to Obama's extention of the drilling moratorium in the Gulf (still ongoing) will be a bigger albatross around his neck than anything he will be dragging now into the 2012 campaign. If that disaster happens this year, his list of Primary challengers will be a long one.
 
I, for one, hope it doesn't come to pass. I'd love to see him get fired after one term, but not that way. That's crazy.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The New Labor Flash Point

This has all been coming for a while. The biggest accomplishment of Obama's explosion in federal spending since he took office was the flow of fed money to states, counties, cities and towns for two years, so they could kick this day down the road. Many of these non-federal entities did not have the power to print money and had to deal with lower tax revenues in 2008-2009 with the bottom line always in mind. They used tons of stimulus ,money to allow themselves some breathing room to keep things somewhat static.
 
With the last election and the rise of the Tea Party, that all ended, and the wall everybody has been careening towards is June 30, 2011- the end of almost every state's fiscal year. In the great laboratory of federalism, each state has gone a different way. NY and California, being the worst off, have done essentially nothing to date, for similar reasons. Andrew Cuomo has talked himself almost out of the Democrat caucus, but accomplished nothing because the state House and Senate are in virtual anarchy. Jerry Brown knows he doesn't have a chance to stop Sacramento from driving them all off a cliff, so he hasn't even tried.
 
Others have done the good Progressive thing and raised taxes. Illinois and Connecticut are both trying to lead the way on this. Wisconsin, New Jersey and Ohio went after spending, and it stood to reason that there were so many sacred cows out there that a fight would be picked somewhere along the line.
 
I wasn't expecting a single flashpoint, however, and Wisconsin is certainly serving itself up for that. The public service unions know that their hard fought contract gains are being threatened, and as the old saying goes, they've decided that this is the mountain they are going to die on.
 
And what a circus it is. It has been enough here to put the incredible popular unrest still going on in earnest in the Middle East and shunt it off camera. The teacher's unions, barred from striking, have all called out en masse -wink, wink- and shut down many school districts entirely. They have also been good enough to take busloads of students away from school, too, to give them all real-world civics lessons.
 
And many other unions have come in to help keep things going. They've turned the state capitol building into a party zone. It is not in use because the Democrat state Senators have bailed out to Illinois so the Republicans can't get a quorum and pass a bill everybody knows they have the votes for.
 
Is it a PR problem for them down the road? You bet. But I don't think that is a priority for them right now. They are fighting a survival game, and most unions in the country obviously feel that if they lose here, it will be the beginning of the end for them in many other places. Hell, if I were in their shoes, I might well feel the same way.
 
Walker can argue all he wants about collective bargaining not being a "right" and he is not proposing them losing any collective powers over salaries, just benefits and pensions. All this will do is raise or lower his reasonability quotient with the swing voters down the road. The unions will not budge.
 
You see, the unions have given back about all they think they can at this point. Many contracts over the last ten years deferred salary increases to better benefit packages, and many times there were new hiring limitations and freezes on the table. In their minds, they HAVE been making sacrifices all along. From my interactions with many of them, they think their sacrifices have been the equivalent of the private sector, and they are happy to use that as a talking point.
 
And that is where they will fail. It's not as if I found this equivalency questionable. I thought it was uproariously funny. The average federal worker has a pay package (salary, benefits, pension, etc.) that is TWICE the average in the private sector. Many states are somewhere in between, but all significantly higher. Most of us in the private sector are left to our own devices for pensions.
 
So I say, let this drag out. Keep the party going. Make your speeches. In time, the numbers they are fighting over in Madison will come out, and the voters will wonder where they can get the benefits that the unions there think are the new Calcutta. Take that to the polls in 2012. I've gone over those numbers. I can't wait for them to be part of the national debate.
 
Earth to the teachers there: do you actually think you are going to get rewarded for acting like this? You have the eternal trump card, because we're doing this for our children and the future. You're throwing more of that away than you realize.
 
Enjoy the circus. Watch the balloons and the Walker = Hitler signs in the capitol. Watch the DNC and "Organizing for America" (Obama's baby) bussing more people in- it's happening already. Watch the demonstrators dancing on Legislator's driveways and scaring their kids. At least the cops will make lots of OT.
 
This is it, folks. The battle has been enjoined, and there is no going back. Either the public workers are in charge, or the taxpayers are. This will all be settled next year. I'm looking forward to it. It's way, way overdue.
 
Governor Christie of New Jersey is betting his new career that getting out in front of the spending problems in our governments is a political asset going forward. The Tea Party types do, too. This is what they voted for. The circus in Madison so far only has Hatfields at the table. The McCoys have not shown up yet. That is coming. That was the unholy surprise of the Tea Party: the Democrats no longer own the streets.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

What's Up With Egypt?

You know current events are confusing as hell when even ground reporters can't maintain any focus. Many people I've talked to have expressed eternal confusion about what is happening there, and for good reason. The reason is, there are a whole host of narratives happening simultaneously, and they are not all directly related to each other.
 
I will try and unhash this the best I can. To do that, I will have to break it into it's varying themes.
 
What started all this? The most popular rolling theory extant is that the recent uprisings in Tunisia sparked it, which I see no reason to dispute at this time. There may be an underlying military factor, but there is no information out there at this time to back that. I know there are military coup rumors already flying, but none of them are coming with solid information yet.
 
Our own intelligence sucks There is good reason for this, but that is an off-focus narrative, and isn't open to rapid summary. I'll take this one up in another blog soon.
 
The global flow of oil This is the underlying subject of most of the world's agida over Egypt. If they fell into unstable hands, or became another Iran, it would threaten both the Suez Canal and the Strait of Hormuz. This could easily lead to $200+/bbl. oil and you would be choosing between eating and driving for at least a year. Nobody on the planet wants this, not even the Soviets, who thrive on Mideast instability to keep their own oil prices high.
 
The eternal Isreal question Even though Mubarak has supported Isreal haters at every pass, Egypt is a very large country that has essentially given up directly challenging Isreal militarily since they got their butts kicked in seven days in 1973. The army trains for action against Isreal all the time, but it has become a wargame staple and not much else. A change in leadership in Cairo could change all this overnight, and the Knesset is presently overdosing on Excedrin.
 
The army factor This is the central part of this story, as well as the most fascinating. Even before the Cold War ended, their military stopped being trained by the Soviets and started matriculating in our military colleges. Mubarak has done his level best to keep churning and rotating the top echelons over the years to prevent a power challenge to himself, but the end result is that the army there is about as pro-Western as you will see in that region. When the demonstrations started, Mubarak asked the army to put them down, and they refused. They have been in charge of the situation ever since. Without their tacit support, this would have been Teheran 2009 all over again. It was the military positioning that forced Mubarek to resign, not the demonstrations. No good Strongman falls for a PR stunt, no matter how many TV cameras are on. Unfortunately, this also means that what happens in the next few months is also in the army's hands, and I personally am not really comfortable with that.
 
The Strongman factor Mubarak's reason for not resigning was one of stability, and he had a point. He just didn't realize that his army was the new power. Remember Yugoslavia? The Croats, Muslims and Christians have been going at it since the 1300's, except for the 40 years that Marshal Tito sat on all of them. They still shoot at each other all the time, taking breaks only when the winter temperatures don't allow them to use their artillery and small arms.
 
The Muslim Brotherhood factor This one is the great unknown. They are widely acknowledged to be the most organized opposition factor on the ground. Like Hamas and Hezbollah, they love passing out cash and foodstuffs to buy public support. Hamas has parlayed this into government power in Lebanon. While I love to see them responsible for picking up the trash and making the power grid function, they still are terrorists. If democracy in Egypt allows the Brotherhood a tangible piece of a coalition, there will be hell to pay down the road. They are not simply community organizers, folks.
 
Whither Democracy? This gets more hopeful and realistic when the government either can't or won't control the international media. Mubarak tried shutting off the internet, and eventually realized he couldn't. Facebook and twitter are all part of the new revolutionary toolbox, and the Western world has long since come to terms with it. Rumor has it that one of the last nails in the Soviet coffin was it's inability to control the news of Chernobyl in '86. It certainly wasn't their first major reactor incident. The control of information is critical to any dictatorship. If you can't do it, you have to let up. This is where China has been for over a decade.
 
If you want't to follow along on this story, events will force you to follow all these narratives. It kind of makes it harder to focus. It's like a reality show with twenty writers. It sure is hell on the brain sometimes.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Florida Healthcare Ruling

The Roger Vinson ruling is just another step on the way to the Supreme Court. It can go Appellate Court and then end up in Washington in a year or so (late this year at the earliest), or it could get fast tracked. This decision practically guarantees the White House will not want such a track. They will want to run out the clock as long as possible, and hopefully watch some more of the Bill get implemented.
 
Just as the White House ran into problems in earlier adjudication because they said publicly that premiums for the mandated health care was not a tax and then argued that it was in court in hopes of making a case that it was covered by the Commerce Clause, Vinson used White House statements that the mandate was essential to the workability of the package to Constitutionally dump the entire plan, not just the mandate.
 
I am not the lawyer and when I read over the damned thing last year, it never would have occured to me that there was no "Severarbility Clause" in it- meaning that you could not legally allow the rest of it to stand alone if you decided the mandate was unconstitutional. Knowing it now, it would seem that this was done deliberately, but I wouldn't venture to guess why.
 
What this decision means is that when it reaches the Supreme Court, they will now be forced to either agree with it or find a reason to show why such a severability should be there anyway. It means that it is more likely that the whole Bill will either pass muster or die en toto. This is bad news for it's supporters, who were left to react by either attacking the qualifications of Judge Vinson or resurrect the new Left counter attack, stating that he is "activist".
 
Which brings me again to the definition of it's use by the Right. Judicial activism is using the bench to create legislation that would not otherwise see the light of day in a legislature. There is no such creation here. Vinson does not suggest any, either. He basically punts it back to Congress and says that it is no good, and here is why. Try it again if you want to. This is the very definition of judicial review set by Justice Marshall in the early 19th century.
 
You are welcome to your talking points, folks. You are not welcome to reset reality with them. Try again.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

State Of The Union

I missed the live version, but I saw enough replays to last a couple of news cycles. I've come to enjoy gandering over the darned thing from the text version- I started that with George W., whose speechifying was often pedantic.
 
Anyhow, the anticipation for this speech was big from the left. It was supposed to be the path for Obama turning everything around, and getting America to tell the tea party to cram it. My first reaction was, well, not much.
 
I mean, it would have been news if he turned a corner with something like "the era of big government is over". Well, nothing like that happened. He danced along for a while before getting to the level of government spending, and then his verbal concessions were followed by more "investments". States are pondering bankruptcy because the feds are drying up their stimulus money, and he is talking about expanding high speed rail! I can't think of a better way to announce that you are still a Keynesian.
 
He is a realist, to some extent. he knew that his defense of public employees had to start with the teachers, where one will find the highest level of bipartisan support. The trouble is, the best teachers can expect in the next couple of years is to minimize layoffs. Here, like in many parts of the country, teachers are underpaid, especially at the entry level. In suburban NY and California, the drain their salaries and pensions put on the public is unsustainable, but other public employees will get axed first, because of the children factor.
 
I don't understand the "Sputnik moment" thing, save to say that he reads Friedman in the Times a lot.
 
I can guess at the semi-worshipful reaction by his base. They pretty much got the political crap beaten out of them over the last two years, and it probably was refreshing to have somebody preaching to their choir. The efforts to pose the reaction of Bachmann, Ryan and Palin as unworthy of public utterance was part of the same movement. It has become an indicator of political legitimacy as a conservative to have your opponents present you as someone not qualified for public conversation.
 
That is old hat now. Unfortunately, so was Obama's speech. Nothing new. Oh, well.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Newt Is Not Happening

Presidential politics becomes more and more prdictable as you inch toward the finish line. In it's early stages, it is near impossible to do anything but guess. That is because it is so personal.
 
It is the end result of a couple of dozen players looking in the mirror and wondering if they have the thick skin, the family support, the fund raising ability, the moxie and the strategy to make anything happen. One of the constants is the old FDR aphorism about "Presidential fever being a disease only cured by repeated injections of formaldehyde".
 
Take Sarah Palin, for instance. I don't think she is plainning to run at this point, I think she is merely trying to set herself up so that she could jump in at any time, if she decided the field was not going to be competitive. However, I don't know her, and I don't presume to do anything more than guess. She may have already decided to jump in at a certain point, I don't know. The less variable end of it is that it is fairly certain that, if she has good people around her, they are probably telling her that she has some horrendous negatives- very expensive and time consuming to overcome.
 
Newt is simpler to summarize, and it is because the overriding factor is not him. It is the political world around him, and how it has changed since 1995.
 
Newt still thinks of himself as an idea man, and this has a clear basis in reality- whether you agree with the ideas or not. He was the point man and the resident genius that turned the reaction against the '94 Congress into a Republican rout. It was his notions of 'majoritarian insurgency' that drove that Congress in it's early months. When Clinton punted the budget with projected deficits into 2005, it was Newt who convinced John Kasich to take it on and actually balance it.
 
After that he lost control of the direction, it became a functionary 'we spend less than they do' creature of Trent Lott and Tom Delay, and the rest is history.
 
Well, here's the thing, folks. The Tea Party movement last year took over the mantle of "idea man", because they all think the Republicans cowed away from it. The ideas now bubble up from the voters to the political class, and they are (at this point) not shy at all about telling the people they helped elect to stick to them ,or they will find somebody else who will.
 
In a world where the program bubbles up from the grass roots, Newt is left to trying to provide original suggestions for enacting them, and there are others with less baggage who can do that, or will be more than willing to try. Newt has become a redundant force.
 
And that's why he will go nowhere. Nobody needs him any more.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

And So It Begins

The Republicans came out today with a plan for cutting $2.29 trillion from the budget over ten years. The specifics can be found at http://www.usnews.com/news/washington-whispers/articles/2011/01/20/house-gop-lists-25-trillion-in-spending-cuts
 
I understand that, to those who don't go along with this, the end of the world is coming. The screaming will commence immediately.
 
Here are some of the wildest ones: first, they cut discretionary spending back to 2008 levels- the ones where Pelosi and her "swamp drainers" were lamenting George W. Bush and his "runaway deficit spending".
 
Eliminate 15% of the federal workforce through attrition. No "automatic" pay increases for five years (I can guess quite a few ways they will try to circumvent that).
 
Here's some things that get cut off entirely: Amtrak. PBS. The National Arts Endowment. UN Climatology studies. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac! If they had done the last one ten years ago, there would have been no implied federal guarantee for private mortgagers to hand out ninja loans to inflate the housing market.
 
Mohair and sugar subsidies. I was so hoping ethanol was on the list, but alas, not yet. There is a vote market out there for an enterprising Presidential candidate to start things off by telling Iowans that their ethanol money train is at an end, have their head handed to them and then find the rest of the country isn't so ready to condemn them.
 
Politics is all about timing. Many of these things have been in the conservative gunsight for years, but the public wasn't ready to go along with them. But when they spend a couple of years watching the national debt balloon up like a malignant tumor, things change.
 
So, here's the crazy part. If you follow along with the NY Times, the network news divisions and CNN, who are still stuck in 1980, there is going to be hell to pay for being so craven with the public trust. And six months later, the polling won't have changed. The same thing happened with ObamaCare, and it's proponents STILL haven't learned what happned to all the swing voters who were their best friends in 2008.
 
I know what happened to them. But nobody from that world wants to hear from me any more.
 
Editor's Note: I understand that the use of military terminology in political discourse is now verboten in some circles. It's not that I don't care. It's that I think the reasoning behind it is....well, vacuous.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

I Am Not A "Birther"

...But I understand where they are coming from.
 
There are only four qualifications for President in the Constitution: native born, 35 years of age, 14 years of residence here and winner of a majority of Electoral votes. If you are a critic of George W. Bush or Sarah Palin, intelligence is often a fifth qualifier, but we can't all be originalists.
 
The native born part has never been an issue before- all the Presidents of my lifetime have been multi-generational natives. Obama was a question because his father was Kenyan and neither one of his parents had deep roots here.
 
The Birther people have been fed by one big issue: nobody has been able to provide an original birth certificate for the man. Hawaii has been nice enough to dump one from their muni files on anybody who asked (until about a year ago, when they stopped because of the volume). That and a birth announcement in a local newspaper are supposed to be enough to shut everybody up.
 
Now the new Governor of Hawaii, an old pal of Barrack's, admits in an interview that he can't find the original.  ( http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=252833 ). Well, that certainly helps things, no?
 
Mind you, I said I am not a Birther. That is to say, once he was sworn in, the questioning became at best unconstructive and at worst, dangerous. Trade agreements and negotiations with foriegn countries held as possibly null and vacant because the President was unconstitutionally sworn? Are you crazy? He won the election, the best thing to do is let it go.
 
The time for this investigation was the spring and summer of 2008. Unfortunately, all the Obama acolytes in politics and the press were taking the tack at the time that this was a dead issue. Not only that, anybody who insisted on raising it was hooted into the same conspiratorial ash heap as those who thought it untoward that Obama would sit in a church pew once a week for twenty years and not absorb any of the crap that the Reverend Wright was slinging.
 
Was it that important to elect him? Even at the cost of having this stupidity hanging over his head now? Next time, can we do a little investigation, before we spend our energies cheerleading candidates in the news divisions?
 
The answer is, probably not. Investigations are for those we hate, and the bulk of the press people who fall in this hole are....moral relativists. That keeps coming back, doesn't it?
 
Follow up: the Governor came out the next day and announce it had been found, but had to backtrack.  http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1348916/Hawaii-governor-says-Obamas-birth-record-exists-produce-it.html#ixzz1BakJm5SA
I really would like this to end constructively- I hope they find it, put it out there, and shut everybody up. This is not constructive for anybody.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Wascally Fools Held At Bay

Well, that one was a great debate in hyperdrive. It takes your breath away to realize how fast things can happen in the brave new (interconnected) world. The prognosis of Congressman Gifford looks up with every day that passes, more decent people formed a wall between the poor Green girl's funeral and the morons of the Westboro Church. The dead and injured remain, but there are good things to be found in tragedy sometimes.
 
One of them is that, despite the behavior of the media, the political class maintained a quiet human dignity, from top to bottom. When you work in Congress, the person across the aisle is a face and a personality. Some of them still set everyone's teeth on edge (like Grayson from Florida), but Gifford was by all accounts a genuine nice person and a class act, and you could tell it really was cutting members of both parties to pieces when the news came.
 
As far as the media goes, a job had to be done. What was said and written set me the hell off, and I obviously wasn't alone. I wasn't about to be defined like that by letting this bulls**t go unanswered, and there was a reaction- a pretty fierce one, too. It did it's job, I doubt many outside the coastal regions of America will walk away with the cause and effect being presented as the new conventional wisdom.
 
There was a new lesson for me, though. I thought the mainstream media could not get any lower than they did during the 2008 campaign, and I was wrong.
 
It's not the MSNBC types that disappoint. Hell, they have the ratings and advertising rates of a 600 watt AM station, so Maddow and Olberman can afford to be what they are. In the world of the small, you can talk like an idiot, and there is little consequence.
 
The NY Times is my heartbreaker. I grew up on that paper. It was the origin of many TV news stories then, too (although for more constructive reasons) and I regarded it as a worthy news reference to bounce other sources off of.
 
That pretty much died by 1995. Their editorial standards seeped into their news content, and when the budget cuts came later it got even worse. Now you can't even potty train dogs with it- it won't absorb any more.
 
The new hope for is all is Paul Krugman. The stuff that drolled off his pen this weekend was beyond the pale. He gives hope to all of us. Even an average joe with the critical thinking skills of a urinal mint can win a Nobel Prize now. Thanks for that, at least.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The "Mourning" Continues

Such as it is. At least the Green family and the Gifford family are maintaining a ring of dignity on their own. All around them, a flock of moral reprobates are pursuing a new narrative. Pieces of it were coming out while the engine on Congressman Gifford's ambulance was still warm.
 
The narrative comes from two directions. One, an acknowledgement from both sides that Bill Clinton's recovery from the Republican tsunami in '94 began in earnest with his response to the tragedy in Oklahoma City. And how did that response start? By painting a picture of talk radio, militias and anti-government types as the incendiaries that set off that bombing.
 
The other part is that it is in the interests of many on the left (at least they have made it obvious) to bag the bodies of Sarah Palin and the tea party people and lock the lid on the dumpster they put them in. So what if it is all a tad unseemly to do it while the dead are still being mourned and the victims recovering? It will help Obama get re-elected. Never let a tragedy go to waste, right?
 
I apologize to everyone for not maintaining a stoic silence in the interests of the dignity I would hope for in all this. It was the hope of at least some of these miscreants that the targets of this diatribe would allow the children to roam the nursery school halls alone for a while, until their spray paint dried into something that could no longer be erased.
 
Welcome to the new world. I am simply following Senator Obama's advice to be sure to bring a "gun to a knife fight". You want to bring a shovel to a public discussion? I'll shovel it back in your face. I'm sorry it has to come to that, but I did NOT start this.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A Congressman Is Violated

And so we are all violated. Congressman Giffords, from CD 8 in Arizona, was holding a public meeting with her constituents when a barely grown nutjob shot her in the head at close range. To complete his own mental picture, he then took out a few other people, including a little girl and a Federal Judge and then sprayed the crowd with gunfire.
.
Thank God Ms. Giffords is starting to look like she will come through this. We should all mourn the dead, pray for their families and ask what we can do to help, and leave it at that. The Conressman's distraught father, when asked who might have it in for her, answered, "The whole tea party". Given what he is going through, that is to be forgiven.
 
But not the rest of the political world. The sun hadn't even set on the day of tragedy when the loons were coming out thick and fast, connecting the troubled lad's act with the tea party, and Sarah Palin and her political action committee.
 
I should not be surprised at any of this. The Columbine shootings a decade ago marked the last time I was able to bring up the defense of the Second Amendment as a legitimate idea in places like New York. Since then, fuses have grown shorter and certain people have grown more intolerant. The notion that they would use a tragedy like this as an opportunity for burping out talking points, and the speed with which they did are part of the new reality of contemporary political dialogue.
 
Fortunately, I am a multi-tasker. I have two hands. One can be outstretched in sympathy for the families of all the victims. The other one can be used to flip the bird of respect to all those who can't manage to maintain their dignity for even one day.
 
The lesson that will have be taught from this is that neither end of the active political spectrum will begin to tolerate this as some sort of political dissent. The man was taken down by bystanders in the crowd. Anybody else who tries it now will get the same treatment, only as soon as they reach in their jacket. It's a rough world, and we all have to adjust.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive