About Me

Name: Bill Crawford
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

ACLU vs. Obama

This President shows us all again what happens when you combine the killer instincts of a true politician with a moral relativism: the ability to turn on a dime, even if it deranges your core supporters.
 
He won accolades in the NY Times for his decision not to continue to appeal the release of photos from Abu Graib. )The ACLU has had a Freedom Of Information Act application on these for years, and it is winding it's way towards the Supreme Court. ) Then he announced this week that he would appeal them anew, for "national security" reasons.
 
Curiously, he speaks publicly about this as if he were a bystander to the process. The truth to that is, the Pentagon has been against this forever, and Holder's Justice Department is all for it. It is not thiers to decide. I guess the buck only stops "here" when it is convenient.
 
So now the icon of the ACLU may well end up named in a separate lawsuit against them. Naaah... if this were Bush, it already would have happened. It is still in their best interests not to make this guy look bad. It also has been noted by these groups that if you get on his bad side, he will cut you off. Ain;t that right, Reverend Wrght?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Conservative Reaction Is Coming

Conservatives have a distinct advantage over their detractors here: they can see both sides of things.
 
If you live in New York or California, and you happen to be one of those who think that Obama is the greatest thing since sliced bread, it is as easy for you to dig up your viewpoint in the media as it is for me to find it. All you have to do is turn on the television. Or read any of the major news weeklies. Or pick up a local newspaper.
 
Since I am a conservative, I can do this any time. When I start reaching for the air sickness bag, I know full well where to go to find a more conservative viewpoint, in any format I choose. I also am far more likely to encouter other conservatives in person.  Obama-ites would have to dig for this stuff, and they often have no desire to.
 
There is a ground swell building in middle America. The last Presidential election was not a Reagan landslide, folks. I'm not the only one out there who feels like they are living through the first six chapters of Ayn Rand's Atlas Shrugged. The leadership in the White House and on Capitol Hill are feeling their oats, are thinking (rightly) that this is the time to strike, and they are going way too far and fast to hold the swing voters for the duration.
 
The area I live in in North Carolina has been dominated by structural Democrats for eons. They have never seen a surge in Republican activism as is happening here right now, not even after Bill Clinton was elected. This is happening in many places. The party is struggling to organize the participation to make it do something, but if it keeps up, the money and the structure will follow.
 
This is the unholy surprise for the people on the coasts: there is virtually no reporting of this going in in your media. It is all happening under the radar. The only instance of it getting out that I've seen was the Tax Day rallies, and they were often used as some sort of comic relief in the mainstream media.
 
My sympathies to those who really need to get out more. Your lack of perspective will kill you politically. If you wait until October of 2010 to wake up to what is happening, you will have not one, but two miserable national election cycles.
 
I understand the Republican leadership of yore is where they are because they are still woking out the machanics of governing. When they ran out of easily enacted ideas in the '90's, they fell back into maintaining a coalition and using their power to stay a majority. Their followers thought they were capable of more.
 
But its not that they lacked followers. Karl Rove's voter targeting in 2002-04 did not pull the voters out of thin air, a la ACORN. These people are out there. The numbers are there. They are begging to be organized.
 
And they are angry as hell. You under estimate them at your peril.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Sorry State Of California

Where do I start? Emigration? (Yes, I said emigration). Taxes? Government? Education? The laundry list is so long, it boggles the mind.
 
There was a great migration westward after World War II that quickly made them pass New York as the most populous State.  A decade later, they were a colossus. They prided themselves in the 1960's and '70's on being the leading edge of politics and law.
 
When the Defense workers left town for other things at the end of the Cold War, they left a political coalition consisting of Simi Valley computer types, urban professionals... and a rapidly growing cordon of immigrants.
 
I've gone on at length what this has done to Long Island in New York. Just imagine it on a much larger scale. You now have a dual whirlpool of flakeboards- the LA basin and the Sacramento/ San Francisco Bay Area competing to see who can drive the poor state farther into the ground.
 
Regarding taxation, it is far and away the worst place to be a taxpayer or a business. Nobody else is close. You pay more for gas there because the EPA rules are dedicated for them. You pay more for cars there because they have their own pollution rules.
 
For many years, the population still grew because of the weather and the burgeoning economy. Now, if they weren't importing more immigrants than anybody else, they would be losing population.
 
A bit of history: in the early 1930's, New York City was the pre-eminent city in the country. When FDR took office, the New Dealers regarded Fiorello LaGuardia and his city as the laboratory for their government experimentation.
 
They did so much "experimentation" that the middle class flew out of there into the newly forming suburbs as fast as they could ten years later, leaving the witches brew that comprises NYC now: large pockets of immobile underclass and the smaller pockets of uber rich that support them.
 
On a larger scale, this is what is happening in California now. There is a middle class stream moving to Nevada, Arizona or north up the coast, to escape the lunacy that comes out of the political class there. That leaves the hordes of Che Guevara rich who seem to like the lunacy.
 
The top 1% of earners there now pay almost half the income tax. The unemployment rate there is almost 12% now- the fourth highest in the country.
 
The political class is happy to give driving privileges and college educations to illegal immigrants, in return for whatever votes they can muster from the Hispanics to keep them in office.
 
These people run a veritable zoo, and then lecture the rest of us about our backward ways. New York and Long Island at least is small enough to wall off, if necessary. Building one around California would be a project.
 
Now they are reaping the penalties of the housing boom more than any other state, and their answer is to raise whatever "fees" they can muster (because Proposition 13 still places a limitation on "tax" increases).
 
The only difference between Governor Wilson and Schwarzenegger is that Wilson was happy to lead the State Legislature off a cliff.
 
If we took Michigan and California out of the national mix, we would be numerically on the road to recovery already. I don't know if I have the patience for political reform there. New York taught me that it may never come, as long as other taxpayers can help fund their mistakes. But what happens when the charity from flyover country dries up?
 
Trust me, that is coming soon. The internet has killed the old Tip O'Neill axiom about "all politics are local". Not any more. Not when the mistakes are available on the Drudge Report the next day.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama Doesn't Want A Recovery

I've had my suspicions about this for a while now. Obama made it painfully clear this week when he came out for closing foriegn corporate tax shelters.
 
Barrack is a smart guy. He must know that we live in a global economy, as Clinton did when he signed onto NAFTA and announced to America that he would sign onto economic growth first, to fund his political agenda.
 
Obama must know that American corporations use these tax shelters to stay competitive with countries who do not live with our insanely high corporate tax rate. If he gets up and talks about this in terms of raising federal revenue, it can only mean that raising federal revenue is a higher priority to him than economic growth.
 
The only other logical possibility is that he is among the hordes of economic ignorami on the political left who view corporations as some sort of bottomless money pit that can be mined at will, as if they are constantly veering between profit and obscene profit, and can be milked politically without consequence.
 
If he is about growth of government first and is paying lip service to recovery in the name of that, what is the middle class to make of all this? There is a clear direction he seems to want to go into, and you won't learn about it in the press.
 
He wants us to be Europe. He wants the government to be the primary employer. He wants the hand of government all over the private sector. He says not, but his actions bely his words. He contends that he does this because he has no choice. Ask the banks that wanted to give the TARP money back. He had a choice there.
 
He hasn't faced down the primary contradiction of Socialism: the State must step in and leaven the world of corporatism because Man is inherently evil, but it is then overseen by men in government- who are less evil how?
 
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Adieu, Jack Kemp

Jack passed away last weekend, after battling cancer the same way he battled life. Jack was an eternal force of nature in the conservative movement.
 
Jack was a well read man. There is no way to overstate that. He was a voracious consumer of ideas. He was the primary individual responsible for introducing Arthur Laffer and supply side economics into American policy. He did this as a Congressman from New York, one of the young Republican lions who had Reagan's ear in the 1970's.
 
Jack had his down side- his Kemp-Roth tax cuts of 1981 (which we all still live under today) would not have passed without Reagan's political acumen. When Jack was the HUD Secretary in the Bush 41 administration, Chief of Staff Sununu and many others in the Cabinet used to make fun of him and his frank enthusiasm for ideas.
 
He was my hope for saving the hapless and hopeless Dole Presidential campaign in 1996. He walked on stage for the VP debate and Al Gore opened by congratulating him for being a conservative who was open to minorities and poor people. Instead of taking him to task for grossly mischaracterizing conservatism, as I would have done, Kemp let the insult to all of us stand with a simple "thank you". His enthusiasm often came at the expense of political wherwithal.
 
Nonetheless, his ideas were powerful, and his influence over policy as a Congressman circa 1981 was probably something not seen since the days of Daniel Webster. He was another example of how, while timing is everything in political history, sticking to your ideals can occasionally pay off in a big way.
 
The political insiders in the beltway used to roll their eyes at him the way the Parliament would roll their eyes at Winston Churchill in the early 1930's. Jack never gave a moment to prove himself sophisticated to the political class- he was too busy with his ideas.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama- Willfully Ignorant

I sat through Obama's press conference last night. It never ceases to amaze me that the networks allow him to make them dump an hour of primetime every month.
 
But I digress. My first revelation was that there was fresh news this week that the economy had contracted over 6% in the first quarter, and nobody asked him about this. Then again, Obama is a bit of a control freak, and I'm betting he had a good idea of what questions were coming from the people he chose.
 
Here is where my radar went wild: he was more than happy to clearly define behaviors approved by his predecessor as "torture", and went on into a five minute homily on how Churchill did not do that to his German detainees during the London blitz.
 
History buff to President: the British did not need any intelligence to know what was coming during the blitz. They knew the best warning they were going to get was a half hour from their primitive radars and the scout sightings from the French resistance. Then all they could do was to fire up their Spitfires and get them in the air. The detainees possessed no knowledge that could improve this picture, and both sides knew it.
 
On top of that, using the Brits as a harbinger of civility belies the experience of the IRA over the years. They learned even by 1940 to have a healthy respect for what became the SAS. The workings of the IRA- their terror style bombings and assasinations wre eminently qualified to be worthy of using harsh methodologies to try and get extra reaction time out of any information the prisoners might give up. And, being that they were as flagless and uniform free as Al Queda, they were beyond the Geneva protocols, too.
 
Obama professes to be a well read man, and I see no reason to doubt this. Culling through history and finding an example like this to use as rationale shows a willingness to cherry pick that is defined as ignorance, but of a willful nature.
 
It's a shame that nobody in the White House Press Corps calls him on this. Than again, under the terms he sets for these events, he wouldn't allow it.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama- Amateur Hour

Why is the head of Homeland Security out front on the swine flu outbreak? Because the summer is almost here and only today are they confirming the Health and Human Services Secretary. Maybe he'll have a complete cabinet before the next budget has to roll out.
 
This is after, in the name of national security, the outgoing President cooperated completely with Obama's transition team to have an administration up and running as soon as possible. Whoever is doing the background checks on these people need to be run out of town. They'll probably end up at Treasury, where the true Obama professionals are still trying to figure out how things work.
 
Then we have an Air Force One plane buzzing the south end of Manhattan at 1000 feet- for a photo opportunity. And tthey didn't tell anyone! People ran out of buildings like lemmings. Hell, I would have, too.
 
So who is in charge here? Is it possible that the warnings that were given about electing a man whose only executive experience was running his own campaign had some heft to them?
 
This guy is a fargin' amateur. The only thing keeping the cane from coming out side stage is his teleprompter crew.
 
They wanted "change", and they got it.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Specter Does The Dive Thing

And who's to complain? We certainly weren't complaining when Shelby led a wave of Democrats defecting to the GOP in 1995. Were they any less opportunistic? All's fair in love and politics.
 
Being that he gave them their 60th vote, the Democrats will have to let him be himself. He is doing this in large part because he knows he wouldn't win a primary fight for his own seat next year. He will vote as he needs to to maintain his centrist position, and he will try to pose himself as a McCain maverick. Even with this, he won't be Harry Reid's biggest party nightmare- that would be Joe Leiberman.
 
This year will be more of a holding pattern anyway. They don't have the votes for carbon cap & trade or health care reform, and will not try to run the table when they don't have the numbers.
 
Next year will be the pressure year. The polls are already showing the Republican Party solidifying again, if only in opposition. I don't see anything close to a 1994 in the offing, but Rahm Emmanuel is smart enough to guess that they have to act as if their Congressional coalitions are at a high water mark, and they will have to play 2010 as if it is their last chance.
 
If they still don't have the votes then for this stuff, we'll see if Obama wants to continue to play it cool (which will kill him) or turns into LBJ and puts some big league pressure on people to deliver votes they normally wouldn't. LBJ used to get people drunk and not let them leave the room until they caved, or would threaten kneecaps, and nobody plays that game in the internet era. 
 
One way or another, next year will be a crazy year. Crazier than 2008.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Absolute Bunk

Of all the things that have come out recently that set off my bulls**t triggers, two stand out in bold relief.
 
First, we tried the Japanese military after WWII for war crimes for the act of waterboarding. Uh, no- we tried them in large part because they used torture for simple punishment and they were in the rather casual habit of executing their torture victims at the end of the process. There is nothing conceiveable in the Al Queda prison experience that comes even close to the Bataan death march. Or what the Phillipinos and Austrailians suffered. Or the Chinese. Give me a break.
 
The second one is worse, because the President is smart enough to know better on this, but repeats the crap tag line anyway: 90% of the weapons seized from the Mexican drug cartels are traced to America. Uh, no again- 90% of the seized weapons that are traceable come from the United States. The untraceable ones come from all over the world, and comprise the great majority of the seized weapons.
 
It's no surprise to me that the internet as a news source can pass bad information from both ends of the spectrum- it's the nature of the beast. The gruesome new world of journalism is that too much of the established media is consciously chasing after the same standard, going from news to propaganda.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Mexico Needs A Berlin Wall

I am not a "stop the immigration" guy. In the great Republican civil war on this, I was on the side of Bush and his work program. Illegal immigration is a serious problem, but there are too many hard working legal Hispanics here who do well for us- and by 2004, many of them were getting into the habit of voting Republican, thanks in large part to George W. Bush.
 
Now look at what we have here. You vacation in Cancun and you put your life in the hands of the Mexican drug cartels. Drug convoys cross the border, often guarded by mercenaries who are off duty Mexican military. Kidnapping in Phoenix is becoming a cottage industry. And now they are being overrun by swine flu.
 
Enough already. I've seen the light. Build a wall, and shut the border down. I'm not talking about a casual wall, either. I mean a full ought, shoot them on sight wall. This is insanity, and it has to stop.
 
When the Mexican government shows me it has the wherwithal to stop this craziness, with our help or without, then open it up again. I'm all for free trade, but not when residents of American cities are afraid to walk the streets.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A Tax Rebate Is Not A Tax Cut

I was alive and conscious during the Presidential campaign last year. Obama was adamant about his tax plan: 95% of American taxpayers would get a "tax cut" under his plan. He sent out a classic, age-old urban 'soak the rich' populist plan, and there was no defining him on the issue in any way other than his words.
 
So, where is it? I'll tell you where you can find it. Look a the withholding in your paychecks. Most people will pick up about $13 extra a week, until the $400 per taxpayer he promised is reached.
 
That's all, folks. Four hundred dollars. Then the government is tapped out. This is the cow that we are all supposed to milk to start the aggregate demand recovery that his Keynesian economic theory holds as our salvation.
 
This is two or three levels of hubris above Clinton formulating his deficit reduction program in 1993 and announcing (after three weeks in office) that "I tried everything I could, but couldn't find a way to do this and give a middle class tax cut", which was a campaign staple for HIM, too.
 
Those of you in the urban areas of this great country, New York and California in particular: when the Bush tax cuts are allowed to die next year (and they most assuredly will), add up your taxes. Fed income, State income, sales tax, property tax and fees of all kinds. When you realize you are well north of 50% of your income, ask yourself: are you happy with this?
 
We live in a country where taxes have crept up to this level, and we have to hire accountants to beat it down to something more affordable on April 15th. We get the money pulled away from us before we get paid and we have to do a ton of paperwork to prove that we deserve some of it back. How nuts is that?
 
Here is the unholy surprise of it all: most of the people who are well off enough to have to deal with the ungodly AMT (Alternative Minimum Tax) VOTED for Obama! Why? He was going to give you some relief from this?
 
So all you Obama voters, when you get your extra $13 next week, and Obama tells you he needs a $650 Billion down payment for health care, are you going to give it back, or just allow him to run up the debt?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Prosecute For Torture? Go For It.

I dare Obama to follow up on this. You want to prosecute Bush officials for torturing Al Quaeda?
 
Bring it on. Let it all go. What could it harm at this point? Release ALL the documents, and show what we got out of them.
 
Then, do the necessary follow up. You want to try these people? Fine. Let's do it right. Make sure that ALL the right people are in the dock. That includes all the Democrats who were in the House and Senate Intelligence Committees in 2002 who signed off on this stuff, and all the senior Democrats who were included- including Nancy Pelosi, who was not only briefed on waterboarding, but given a tour of facilities to get a first hand look at how it would be done.
 
The cajones it takes to be this blatantly hypocritical is astounding. Let 'em all lawyer up.
 
C'mon, let's play. I'm ready. Are they? Be careful what you wish for.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

What Is Up With Janet Napolitano?

We all saw this coming- a Homeland Security head whose experience had nothing to do with security. Her credentials consisted of being a border state Governor, and not much else.
 
After all the redefinitions of terms- "International Contingency Operation" and all that, she puts forth a report on all the potential McVie terrorists in our house. We have seen the problem, and it is our own right wing nuts. On top of that, she implicated the large number of military veterans here, something she had to quickly back track on.
 
Now she says that the 9/11 hijackers came through the Canadian border. This has long been passed off as theory and disproved. Even if it was true, what is the point? What is the reasoning behind getting Canada angry with us at this juncture?
 
We are in the process of apologizing to Mexico for us causing it's problems when the Mexican border is a horror show. Hell, there is a cross-border kidnapping industry going on right now in the Phoenix area that is scaring the wits out of the people there, and we coddle Mexico and talk down Canada?
 
She has to go. Now. This is intolerable.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

We Have Found The Problem, And It Is Us.

We not only recant and apologize to the world for torturing Al Queda's best, but we are leaving open the option of prosecuting Bush officials for authorizing it.
 
I won't even get into how the Geneva Convention doesn't cover these people, for so many reasons it is ludicrous to list. The simple fact is that we are at war with these people, and they will not let up. Ask Daniel Pearl how they treated him.
 
Fairy tale one: if we follow the Army Field Manual, they will treat our people better. This didn't happen with the Japanese, the Koreans, the Viet Cong or the Iraqis in the first Gulf War. It certainly hasn't been the case with Al Queda.
 
Fairy tale two: these techniques don't work- the victims will say anything to make it stop. This is absolute, unmitigated bunk. The twentieth century was a dirty world with this stuff, and the KGB, CIA, M6 and Mossad did not work these things out without getting any verifiable results. I have been told that many of the still classified reports about the early Al Queda interrogations provided a bounty of verifiable information.
 
Fairy tale three: if we turn our guns first on the political opposition here, the jihadists will see that we have truly reformed and drop their aggression towards us. Their jihad is not based on any of this, and will not be ameliorated by Obama going on Al Jezzera and making nice. They want us off the planet because we are heathens who live decadent lifestyles. Killing us is their ticket to heaven. Are we all clear on that?
 
When we captured them after 9/11, and went past the FBI investigators and actually made them feel like they were in danger, it set them off balance. If they lose that fear of us, we have a problem.
 
I am a libertarian at heart, and I fully understand the Constitution and it's implications in this. But the Constitution is NOT a suicide pact, and these people need to be hit- hard. If I suspect that some of them are holding information about an impending American attack, I will be happy to personally provide the car battery, some cables and a nice bucket of wet sponges. If what we do does not result in some serious pupil dilation on their part, we may as well let them loose.
 
Which, come to think of it, is exactly what this White House is talking about doing. It's possible they just don't think we are at war. Worse, they may well know we are, and think this is the way to win it.
 
With that, who the hell should be prosecuting who around here?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

I must Have Been On A Different Planet...

I attended a Tax Day Rally in New York last Wednesday. There were a few hundred there, many of them coming from work. They had children there, home made signs, no visible means of support. They weren't getting stipends from MoveOn or ACORN to show up. They were all dressed well, and they left no litter.

They were all over the map with their messages, but came into focus when a speaker centered them on the notion that a democratic majority had no right to spend their children's money to have the government become partners in large parts of the economy.

When I checked out videos of other rallies on YouTube and Fox News, nothing I saw changed this picture. Then I switched to CNN, and I was transported to another world. There was an emphasis on the country music in the background. The attendees sported mullets and pony tails, and few of them could manage a coherent thought on camera.

In short, the Tax Day crowds were a bunch of ignorant rubes, who didn't seem to know why they were even there. 

And to top it off, my YouTube searches culminated in the summary of Janeane Garafolo on Keith Olbermann's Countdown, who filled in all the blanks for those who weren't yet clued in. The Tax Day participants were against health care, against government, against democracy and, last but not least, against a Black man in the White House. It never takes long for that one to come out again, does it?

This is where you go when you put the Left in charge. They cry about free speech when anybody publicly disagrees with them, then they do their best to shut down anybody who masses against them. They insult, they demonize and they censor. They shout and they throw cream pies if they have to. And it is all justified because theirs is a good cause and they know they are right.


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive